I’m saying if you participate in something to the degree that you are living though those actions yourself in role-play; in your mind your are performing those actions and your are doing that; you’re not reading or watching someone else tell a story, you are making a fantasy for it. In that senario fantasy and actually performing the act are both equally sinful.

“3) Vore that doesn’t do 2 or 3 but assumes pain or control of the victim — these acts are rooted in at least a light degree of Sadomasochism, which play on pain (which, probably was not an original part of creation) to control the victim.” Xyie engages in vore where the other furry is swallowed into a warm pouch which contains no digestive juices; I don’t believe this involves any degree of pain. You might say it involves assuming control of the “victim”; I don’t know what I’d say to that, except that I hope he’s the kind of dragon who’d spit the occupant out upon request. I’ll need to ask him.

“[A]s for practice it is something that will eventually encourage you to try more types of vore and can quickly lead to 1 and 2.” Reminds me of an argument people have against pawing off: they claim that it increases the temptation to engage in far more illicit and dangerous types of sexual sin. Maybe you should make a post about pawing, too.

You don’t actually say why vore is sinful in this post. I think that would be a good thing to add.

I pray for you.

Tell you what, since you’ll see this anyway, why don’t you decline this comment from moderation? That way what is private can remain private.